[#] S. M. Vallina, Ricardo Garcia-Martinez, S. Lan Smith & Juan A. Bonachela (2019)
Models in microbial ecology PDF
Encyclopedia of Microbiology (4th Edition), Elsevier, Pages 211-246
Highlights: We provide a review of the state-of-the-art of models in microbial ecology, ranging from the microscopic level (e.g., resource uptake) to the macroscopic level (e.g., spatial organization). Special emphasis is given to the modelling of (i) uptake kinetics, elemental stoichiometry and functional trade-offs; (ii) food web and eco-evolutionary dynamics; (iii) micro-scale variability and social behavior in microbes. The overarching point of view is the use of theoretical models to improve our understanding of how microbial communities operate and affect ecosystem functioning.
[#] P. Cermeno, M. J. Benton, Oscar Paz & Christian Verard (2017)
Trophic and tectonic limits to the global increase of marine invertebrate diversity
Scientific Reports, Volume 7, Article number: 15969
Highlights: We use statistical methods for causal inference to investigate the drivers of marine invertebrate diversity dynamics through the Phanerozoic. We find that diversity dynamics responded to secular variations in marine food supply, substantiating the idea that global species richness is regulated by resource availability. Once diversity was corrected for changes in food resource availability, its dynamics were causally linked to the age of the subducting oceanic crust. We suggest that the time elapsed between the formation (at mid-ocean ridges) and destruction (at subduction zones) of ocean basins influences the diversity dynamics of marine invertebrates and may have contributed to constrain their diversification.
[#] S. M. Vallina, P. Cermeno, S. Dutkiewicz, M. Loreau & J. M. Montoya (2017)
Phytoplankton functional diversity increases ecosystem productivity and stability
Ecological Modelling, Volume 361, Pages 184-196
Highlights: We use an ecosystem process model to explore the potential effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning for marine phytoplankton. Multiple phytoplankton species, representing differing degrees of functional diversity, are defined by their species-traits with respect to two environmental niche gradients: nutrient concentration and ocean temperature. The resulting predictions are that (1) functional diversity through temperature niches strongly promotes productivity and stability due to species complementarity via environmental filtering; (2) functional diversity of competitive abilities has a weaker effect on ecosystem function due to sampling probability via resource competition. Conceptually, this study calls attention to an important distinction between functional diversity that creates distinct niches with respect to climatic variables (temperature), versus diversity that creates differences within shared niches with respect to abiotic variables (resources).
[#] S. Lan Smith, Sergio M. Vallina & Agostino Merico (2016)
Phytoplankton size-diversity mediates an emergent trade-off in ecosystem functioning for rare versus frequent disturbances
Scientific Reports, Volume 6, Article number: 34170
Highlights: We developed a continuous trait-distribution model for a phytoplankton community of gleaners (those species that do well when nutrients are scarce) competing with opportunists (species that do well when nutrients are plentiful). Then we subjected the model community to differing frequencies of disturbance, in order to examine diversity-productivity relationships at different time-scales. This study revealed that more diverse communities tend to be more productive in the short-term under frequent disturbance because diversity enhances adaptive capacity, which is the ability to recover from sudden changes in environmental conditions. On the other hand, less diverse communities tend to be more productive over long periods with infrequent disturbance, because then the most productivie community is composed of (nearly) identical species having just the optimal traits (inherent characteristics) for the nearly constant environmental conditions. Taken together these results show that more diversity does not in all cases enhance productivity, but that the diversity-productivity relationship changes with the frequency of disturbance.
[#] P. Cermeno, P. G. Falkowski, O. E. Romero, M. F. Schaller, and S. M. Vallina (2015)
Continental erosion and the Cenozoic rise of marine diatoms
PNAS April 7, 2015. 112 (14) 4239-4244
Highlights: Diatoms are silica-precipitating microalgae responsible for roughly one-fifth of global primary production. The mechanisms that led these microorganisms to become one of the most prominent primary producers on Earth remain unclear. We explore the linkage between the erosion of continental silicates and the ecological success of marine diatoms over the last 40 My. We show that the diversification and geographic expansion of diatoms coincide with periods of increased continental weathering fluxes and silicic acid input to the oceans. On geological time scales, the ocean’s biologically driven sequestration of organic carbon (the biological pump) is proportional to the input flux of inorganic nutrients to the oceans. Our results suggest that the strength and efficiency of the biological pump increased over geological time.
[#] S. M. Vallina, M. J. Follows, S. Dutkiewicz, J. M. Montoya, P. Cermeno & M. Loreau (2014)
Global relationship between phytoplankton diversity and productivity in the ocean
Nature Communications volume 5, Article number: 4299
Highlights: We use a marine ecosystem model together with the community assembly theory to explain the shape of the unimodal productivity-diversity relationship (PDR) we observe at the global scale for phytoplankton. The positive slope from low to intermediate productivity is due to grazer control with selective feeding, which leads to the predator-mediated coexistence of prey. The negative slope at high productivity is due to seasonal blooms of opportunist species that occur before they are regulated by grazers. The negative side is only unveiled when the temporal scale of the observation captures the transient dynamics, which are especially relevant at highly seasonal latitudes. Thus selective predation explains the positive side while transient competitive exclusion explains the negative side of the unimodal PDR curve. The phytoplankton community composition of the positive and negative sides is mostly dominated by slow-growing nutrient specialists and fast-growing nutrient opportunist species, respectively.
[#] S. M. Vallina, B. A. Ward, S. Dutkiewicz & M. J. Follows (2014)
Maximal feeding with active prey-switching: A kill-the-winner functional response and its effect on global diversity and biogeography PDF
Progress in Oceanography, 120 (2014), Pages 93–109
Highlights:We describe a kill-the-winner formulation that combines active switching with maximal feeding. Active switching is shown to be a community response in which some predators become prey-selective and the formulations with maximal or non-maximal feeding are implicitly assuming different food web configurations. Global simulations using a marine ecosystem model with 64 phytoplankton species belonging to 4 major functional groups show that the species richness and biogeography of phytoplankton are very sensitive to the choice of the functional response for grazing. The phytoplankton biogeography reflects the balance between the competitive abilities for nutrient uptake and the degree of apparent competition which occurs indirectly between species that share a common predator species. The phytoplankton diversity significantly increases when active switching is combined with maximal feeding through predator-mediated coexistence.